"Older viewers may remember that right-wing jerk Mark Simspon saying Tom was straight."
See, it's dishonest shit like this that makes me distrust everything else you daub. You know full well the article said something quite different. As you also know that headlines are often not the authors own. But you tried.
This site is unique and potentially a valuable resource. If I could trust it.
Please leave the ego shit to your twitter account; no one (other than your pet arse lickers) care about your personal vendettas, professional rivalries/jealousies, and petty point scoring. FACTS and CUNTITUDE. It can be done well. Just not here. Yet.
And so you're unequivocally stating that first line was Simpson's own view rather than him summarizing Daley's (alleged) position at the time? C'mon! If that's your take home from the entire article you have serious comprehension problems, son. Partcularly so considering he then goes on to speculate that he might indeed be gay -- OR BI.
BTW he's still ISN'T GAY. Until he says he is. Deal ;)
You seem to be confusing being gay with coming out as gay. Saying that "Tom Daley isn't gay" isn't the same as stating Daley's position at the time. As I say, he clearly sets his stall out in the first sentence...
"Older viewers may remember that right-wing jerk Mark Simspon saying Tom was straight."
ReplyDeleteSee, it's dishonest shit like this that makes me distrust everything else you daub. You know full well the article said something quite different. As you also know that headlines are often not the authors own. But you tried.
This site is unique and potentially a valuable resource. If I could trust it.
Please leave the ego shit to your twitter account; no one (other than your pet arse lickers) care about your personal vendettas, professional rivalries/jealousies, and petty point scoring. FACTS and CUNTITUDE. It can be done well. Just not here. Yet.
Simpleton does kind of set his stall out in the first sentence:
DeleteTom Daley isn't gay.
And so you're unequivocally stating that first line was Simpson's own view rather than him summarizing Daley's (alleged) position at the time? C'mon! If that's your take home from the entire article you have serious comprehension problems, son. Partcularly so considering he then goes on to speculate that he might indeed be gay -- OR BI.
DeleteBTW he's still ISN'T GAY. Until he says he is. Deal ;)
So if I say I'm a horse does that make me a horse?
DeleteBTW he's still ISN'T GAY. Until he says he is.
DeleteYou seem to be confusing being gay with coming out as gay. Saying that "Tom Daley isn't gay" isn't the same as stating Daley's position at the time.
As I say, he clearly sets his stall out in the first sentence...
No. You can't be a horse. But he COULD be gay, bi, or confused straight. Only HE knows for certain; only he can tell us.
DeleteYou are an ASS tho.
Smooches.