Gay marriage has been an odd compromise, a peculiar fusion of liberal
and
conservative values. It has allowed the Prime Minister to reprise his
marital theme, albeit with a new twist. Conservatives should not just
tolerate same-sex weddings, he says, but insist upon them. Yet he has
failed
to do the obvious thing: accompany the gay-marriage legislation with
measures to strengthen marriage in general. It would have given him
political cover to implement a tricky manifesto pledge (to recognise
marriage in the tax system), and helped to repair relations with his
party.
Yet he chose not to, for reasons that still baffle some of his closest
allies...
Fraser Nelson - he's the editor of The Spectator who's on Question Time too much and who Tory matriarchs probably think is "rather dishy" - banging on again in the Daily Telegraph.
Odd that he seems to be saying the best argument for the holy institution of marriage is tax-breaks.
There's also a number of wonderfully
barking letters in the Telegraph today explaining why Christians who
opposed apartheid and slavery should also be opposed to gay
marriage.
PS The Marriage Bill will be debated in the Lords again on Monday - to be continued Tuesday if they won't shut up - or all nod off.
George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury - who gets a free seat in the Lords for services to the Great Sky Pixie - is already gearing up by saying gay marriage will lead to sibling marriage and polygamy - like they have in the Bible.
Friday, 31 May 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment