Civil partnerships for gay couples were a great step forward, but the
question
now is whether it is any longer acceptable to exclude people from
marriage
simply because they love someone of the same sex.
Marriage has evolved over time. We believe that opening it up to
same-sex
couples will strengthen, not weaken, the institution. As David Cameron
has
said, we should support gay marriage not in spite of being
Conservatives,
but because we are Conservatives.
Our party also has a strong belief in religious freedom, a vital element
of a
free society. The Bill ensures that no faith group will be forced to
conduct
same-sex marriages. The legal advice is clear that these protections
for
religious groups cannot be overturned by the courts.
Religious freedom works both ways. Why should faith groups, such as the
Quakers, that wish to conduct gay marriages be forbidden from doing
so? This
Bill will enhance religious freedom, not restrict it.
Attitudes towards gay people have changed. A substantial majority of the public now favour allowing same-sex couples to marry, and support has increased rapidly. This is the right thing to do at the right time. We will be among the Conservative MPs voting for this Bill today.
William Hague MP (Con)
George Osborne MP (Con)
Theresa May MP (Con)
London SW1
The Daily Telegraph.
Nine articles and a rather baffling cartoon in the famously anti-equality Telegraph online in the last 24 hours.
This was the first time it had given pro-equality voices any prominence in over 17 months - ie ever.
My favourite letter today was...
SIR – Would a fish be a chicken because Cameron's Government said so? Could a man marry his horse? However they dress it in the guise of "equality", the fact (even after today's vote) is that only a man and a woman can become one in marriage – the Creator designed it so.
Fr John McLoughlin
Liverpool
If anyone knows what the fuck this means, please email me.
I presume Father John fucks horses.
Well done for coming out about that, your holy madness.
Attitudes towards gay people have changed. A substantial majority of the public now favour allowing same-sex couples to marry, and support has increased rapidly. This is the right thing to do at the right time. We will be among the Conservative MPs voting for this Bill today.
William Hague MP (Con)
George Osborne MP (Con)
Theresa May MP (Con)
London SW1
The Daily Telegraph.
Nine articles and a rather baffling cartoon in the famously anti-equality Telegraph online in the last 24 hours.
This was the first time it had given pro-equality voices any prominence in over 17 months - ie ever.
My favourite letter today was...
SIR – Would a fish be a chicken because Cameron's Government said so? Could a man marry his horse? However they dress it in the guise of "equality", the fact (even after today's vote) is that only a man and a woman can become one in marriage – the Creator designed it so.
Fr John McLoughlin
Liverpool
If anyone knows what the fuck this means, please email me.
I presume Father John fucks horses.
Well done for coming out about that, your holy madness.
A fish by any other name...
ReplyDeleteCould a fish fuck a chicken?
DeleteThis worries me.
Bombay duck isn't a duck but a fish and although it's stated that caligula married his horse, he only made it a senator.
ReplyDeletex