Tuesday, 25 February 2014

Daily Mail: Sorry?

This is the Daily Mail at its worst.
As before, it's an old story.
And it's a non-story - there are no 'links'
It's just a smear story on Labour and Liberty.
Still the Mail Online has filed ten stories in the last 24 hours alone.
And so hypocritical as the Mail loves publishing sexualised images of young girls saying they look "all grown up".
Pathetic.

Politician slammed for links with known paedo

2 comments:

  1. A story can be true even if the Daily Mail publish it. Harman and co aren't suing, and they can't because the historical facts are as stated, regardless of the Mail's agenda in pushing it. The fact that it is an old story does not make it a non-story. If it had been Tories excusing and allying with paedophiles then predictably the Mail would be avoiding the story like the plague - equally you would be all over it. You seem to be incapable of treating a story on its merits rather than according to whom it makes look good or bad. In that you are no more honest than the Mail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "You seem to be incapable of treating a story on its merits rather than according to whom it makes look good or bad. In that you are no more honest than the Mail".

    Seconded.

    ReplyDelete