Sarah Wollaston said that certain parts of the political blogosphere were “quite aggressive in their approach towards women”, particularly when discussing sexual violence or gender. “If you stick your head above the parapet you can expect some quarters of the aggressive blogging community to go for you,” she said.
Dr Wollaston, the Totnes MP, faced a barrage of criticism last week after Nigel Evans, the deputy speaker, was cleared of a string of sex charges. One of the alleged victims was in a Westminster bar with the former GP when an “off-the-cuff” remark about an alleged assault triggered a sequence of events that led to the court case. Dr Wollaston was contacted by a second man — a friend of the first — who alleged that he had been raped.
The MP listened to their complaints and took them to John Bercow, the Speaker, who said that he could not help. She then passed on police contact details to the alleged victims, who contacted the officers, prompting the arrest last year of Mr Evans.
The acquittal of the MP for Ribble Valley led to accusations that Dr Wollaston had put pressure on the accusers to complain. She responded with an article entitled “Why am I being blamed for Nigel Evans sex case?” in which she argued that she had an ethical duty to take their claims seriously...
She singled out The Daily Telegraph writer Dan Hodges, the libertarian blog Guido Fawkes, and the Tory publisher and writer Iain Dale, saying that she had been reading their “really quite aggressive attacks” about her handling of the allegations...
Let's have a look at what those really quite aggressive bullying male bloggers wrote...
YEAH! AND ALL THAT!' Poor lay-out though. OR N? |
Dan Hodges, The Daily Telegraph “Partly because of her actions, a wholly innocent man had his reputation destroyed and his career ruined and now faces crippling debts to cover the cost of his legal fees”
Paul Staines, Guido Fawkes “Did she, as Evans implies, have an ulterior motive? [She said:] ‘I reject that idea entirely.’ Many of Wollaston’s colleagues disagree...”
NB Out of these three men at least two are gay and two are Tories. Just putting that out there...
"NB Out of these three men at least two are gay"
ReplyDeleteAt least two? TWO? Really? Are you certain? Are they? Interesting
You been drinking?
Deletex
Yes and two of them are repulsive right wingers. Dr Wollaston's main mistake seems to have been in thinking that Speaker might investigate these claims. It was he who suggested involving the Police. Why isn't he being attacked? Could the answer be because he's a powerful man?
ReplyDeleteKinda, but...
DeleteSW; "After the first meeting, JB took legal advice, then sent a member of his staff to tell me that he could not become involved. The messenger repeatedly told me that his job was to protect the Speaker. So the only avenue open to the complainants was to go to the police.”
Is it Paul Staines what is the arse bandit bender boy? Or is it the cyclops?
DeleteLet us not reduce ourselves to that level!
DeleteI thought it had been reported that the Speaker suggested it was a police matter, but in fact after she spoke to the Speaker, she received a ''phone call from the Metropolitan Police about the allegations. She didn't say what prompted that call. She didn't name the complainants to the police, but passed the police contact details onto them.
DeleteI find it very difficult to see what she did wrong and all this seems to be a distraction from the main issue. Namely, the CPS seemingly doing its best to prosecute Jimmy Saville by proxy and the police trawling for "victims" who said in court they didn't consider themselves to be such. It all sounds very McCarthyite.