The way we walked: London Pride 1985 |
We were shocked to see that the Pride in London (PiL) committee has now decided not to allow supporters of LGSM from the unions to march at the front with them, preferring instead to give pride of place to corporate sponsors such as Barclays, Citibank and Starbucks.
This domination of the corporations at Pride must be questioned, and the success of the film Pride should have provided the perfect springboard for that. The fact that the chair of PiL is political head of broadcasting at 10 Downing Street shows how far we have moved from the origins of Pride protests in the Stonewall riots in New York in 1969. It would seem that PiL is echoing the government in its determination to sideline unions and silence protest.
We are determined to challenge the portrayal of Pride as a showcase for multinational companies. Among the companies currently sponsoring Pride are those who must be held responsible for the financial crisis, don’t pay their taxes and don’t allow unions to organise.
LGSM will now be heading a union bloc in the middle of the parade, and we hope people will turn up in large numbers to join in with their posters, placards and loud voices. Thirty years ago we had to take on the union-busters and supporters of clause 28 under Margaret Thatcher. Today David Cameron has made clear his intention to shackle the unions and ramp up austerity measures that will hit LGBT people hard. It’s time to reclaim the true spirit of Pride.
Letter to The Guardian signed by LGSM and a number of trade unionists.
Please don't tell me you're surprised by any of this.
There's as much chance of stopping London Pride being a shameless slave-whore to big business as there is of me becoming the next Labour leader.
There's as much chance of stopping London Pride being a shameless slave-whore to big business as there is of me becoming the next Labour leader.
Pride's original offer to LGSM to lead the parade seemed more about the movie than the movement, anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment