HIS exposure as a Soviet agent was one of the greatest shocks of the
cold war. Now
it has emerged that Sir Anthony Blunt, the pillar of the Establishment
who
turned out to be the fourth man in the Cambridge spy ring, admitted his
treachery to the art critic Brian Sewell years before he was publicly
named.
Sewell, who studied under Blunt at the Courtauld Institute of Art in
London,
reveals in a new memoir that he found out about his mentor’s spying not
long
after MI5 had extracted his confession in 1964.
Blunt, who worked for the security services during the second world war,
had
denied being recruited by the Soviets throughout his 11 previous
interrogations.
His treachery remained unknown to all but a select few until Margaret
Thatcher
named him on the floor of the Commons in 1979. The shock was increased
by
Blunt’s status as a close adviser to the monarch — he was surveyor of
the
Queen’s pictures from 1945-72.
The two men became friends in the mid-1950s when Sewell was a student at
the
Courtauld, where Blunt was director from 1947 until his retirement in
1974.
“Anthony told me in the mid-1960s that he’d been a spy,” said Sewell,
whose
latest memoir, Outsider II, is published on November 1. “It simply came
up
in a conversation we were having one day. I didn’t see any reason to
discuss
it with him much more.”
He also says the Queen knew of Blunt’s spying, but still kept him in his
royal
post for nearly a decade after finding out. “The Queen had been told he
was
a spy after his confession,” Sewell said...
The Sunday Times.
Eh?
Saying nobody knew Blunt was a spy is like saying nobody knew Sir Jimmy Savile had a thing for underage girls.
What next?
Stevie Wonder's blind?
Showing posts with label the queen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the queen. Show all posts
Sunday, 14 October 2012
Antony Blunt: The Lies Of Brian
Labels:
Antony Blunt,
Brian Sewell,
the queen
Tuesday, 25 September 2012
Andy Warhol: Four Queens
Andy Warhol, who famously said he wanted to be as famous as the Queen,
has had
four of his celebrated portraits of Elizabeth II acquired by the Royal
Collection.
Fittingly, as the Queen marked her 60th year on the throne this year, the works — created in 1985 and part of a series called Reigning Queens — are sprinkled with diamond dust.
They will be displayed for the first time in the exhibition The Queen: Portraits Of A Monarch from November 23, which is being staged at Windsor Castle...
The Times.
Fittingly, as the Queen marked her 60th year on the throne this year, the works — created in 1985 and part of a series called Reigning Queens — are sprinkled with diamond dust.
They will be displayed for the first time in the exhibition The Queen: Portraits Of A Monarch from November 23, which is being staged at Windsor Castle...
The Times.
Labels:
Andy Warhol,
the queen
Saturday, 28 July 2012
Olympics: Is That It?
Well, if even a miserable old cynic like me enjoyed Danny Boyle's Olympics Opening Ceremony spectacular, it must have had something going for it.
One point though - which I hope doesn't sound too parochial (or like a knee-jerk gay journalist's Dave Spartism).
The ceremony was clearly trying to show what a wonderfully diverse and inclusive place modern Britain has become - particularly the second half.
And it picked as two of a handful of historic moments that made modern Britain, the Suffragettes and Windrush.
So where were we?
It seems incongruous as so much of the soundtrack (Kinks, Queen, Bowie, Frankie...)* hinted at what a queer old place this is.
I may have missed something, but all I saw was a snippet of the "Brookside lesbian kiss".
But this was so brief I doubt hardly anyone would realise what was going on if they didn't know of the fabled "Brookside lesbian kiss". **
[The kissing segment is 1.05 in here. I'd estimate the Brookside bit is two or three seconds long - out of an 80 minute show! If anyone's fast enough to actually time it, please let me know].
There was one other thing, that I'm not too sure about - again it was a blink-and-you'll-miss-it-moment.
As the Queen and James Bond flew over London there was a few fleeting seconds of the scene on the right.
It could just be some men in their best suits drinking Champagne - or is it meant to be a civil partnership?
As with the above was it deliberately brief, and vague - and thus really a quite pointless gesture.
Wouldn't this have been something to go big on, if you wanted to show the world how much this country's changed for the better?
Update: Unfeasibly right-wing Tory MP Aidan Burley calls the ceremony "leftie multicultural crap". Not a patch on Berlin 1936, eh Aidan?
* There was a distant clip of Bowie doing Starman on Top Of The Pops, which you could call a pretty seminal gay moment, but this had no context.
** Postscript: The Guardian online calls the kiss a "Little-noticed 'special statement'" - it's hardly much of a statement if hardly anyone noticed it. I think this was intentional.
One point though - which I hope doesn't sound too parochial (or like a knee-jerk gay journalist's Dave Spartism).
The ceremony was clearly trying to show what a wonderfully diverse and inclusive place modern Britain has become - particularly the second half.
And it picked as two of a handful of historic moments that made modern Britain, the Suffragettes and Windrush.
So where were we?
It seems incongruous as so much of the soundtrack (Kinks, Queen, Bowie, Frankie...)* hinted at what a queer old place this is.
I may have missed something, but all I saw was a snippet of the "Brookside lesbian kiss".
But this was so brief I doubt hardly anyone would realise what was going on if they didn't know of the fabled "Brookside lesbian kiss". **
[The kissing segment is 1.05 in here. I'd estimate the Brookside bit is two or three seconds long - out of an 80 minute show! If anyone's fast enough to actually time it, please let me know].
There was one other thing, that I'm not too sure about - again it was a blink-and-you'll-miss-it-moment.
As the Queen and James Bond flew over London there was a few fleeting seconds of the scene on the right.
It could just be some men in their best suits drinking Champagne - or is it meant to be a civil partnership?
As with the above was it deliberately brief, and vague - and thus really a quite pointless gesture.
Wouldn't this have been something to go big on, if you wanted to show the world how much this country's changed for the better?
Update: Unfeasibly right-wing Tory MP Aidan Burley calls the ceremony "leftie multicultural crap". Not a patch on Berlin 1936, eh Aidan?
* There was a distant clip of Bowie doing Starman on Top Of The Pops, which you could call a pretty seminal gay moment, but this had no context.
** Postscript: The Guardian online calls the kiss a "Little-noticed 'special statement'" - it's hardly much of a statement if hardly anyone noticed it. I think this was intentional.
Monday, 4 June 2012
Thought For The Day: Sue Townsend
"I stopped believing in the royal family when I was a child, at the same time I stopped believing in god - they all seemed to come from the same place. I find it difficult to take the whole thing seriously."
Sue Townsend, The World At One.
Sue Townsend, The World At One.
Labels:
diamond jubilee,
the queen,
world at one
Saturday, 2 June 2012
Diamond Jubilee: Hurrah!
Congratulations, your maj!
Fagburn can't begin to describe his excitement at this weekend's Diamond Jubilee celebrations.
Today we are holding a street party outside Fagburn Towers where we will feast on bunting and ambient sausage rolls.
I'm also loving the Mail Online who have run over 60 Royal stories in the past 24 hours.
Tomorrow it's off to London to watch a massive watery pageant featuring some boats and a mere 13,000 police officers and security dudes to protect Lil from her adoring subjects.
On Monday it's the the concert at Buckingham Palace starring Shirley Bassey, Sir Elton of John, Dame Cliff Richard, Gary Barlow CBBC and so many more of today's tip-top musical entertainers.
Rumour has it the night will climax with Queen Elizabeth ripping off her mask and finally revealing her real shape-changing reptilian self as thousands cheer.
You have brought so much joy to members of this country's stupid community, ma'am.
May you reign for sixty more anti-democratic years!
PS Peter Tatchell says she has done nowt for The Gays. Fair point - though she has given rather a lot of them jobs.
Fagburn can't begin to describe his excitement at this weekend's Diamond Jubilee celebrations.
Today we are holding a street party outside Fagburn Towers where we will feast on bunting and ambient sausage rolls.
I'm also loving the Mail Online who have run over 60 Royal stories in the past 24 hours.
Tomorrow it's off to London to watch a massive watery pageant featuring some boats and a mere 13,000 police officers and security dudes to protect Lil from her adoring subjects.
On Monday it's the the concert at Buckingham Palace starring Shirley Bassey, Sir Elton of John, Dame Cliff Richard, Gary Barlow CBBC and so many more of today's tip-top musical entertainers.
Rumour has it the night will climax with Queen Elizabeth ripping off her mask and finally revealing her real shape-changing reptilian self as thousands cheer.
You have brought so much joy to members of this country's stupid community, ma'am.
May you reign for sixty more anti-democratic years!
PS Peter Tatchell says she has done nowt for The Gays. Fair point - though she has given rather a lot of them jobs.
Labels:
Mail Online,
Peter Tatchell,
Royal family,
the queen
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
The Queen: Unspeak
'Get on with it, you Bercow! Cameron looks ratty as Speaker hijacks the Queen's Jubilee address to waffle on about gay rights'
Serial liar about gay stuff, The Daily Mail.
Err, John Bercow did not actually mention the gays.
Beyond talking about people "regardless of how they live, how they look or how they love"
Hardly a rant,
Watch it here.
PS Wonderful self-serving press release from the bonkers Lance Price at the Kaleidoscope Trust here.
Where the Mail got their non-story from. Cheers, SG.
Update: I despair of the fucking Guardian.
Serial liar about gay stuff, The Daily Mail.
Err, John Bercow did not actually mention the gays.
Beyond talking about people "regardless of how they live, how they look or how they love"
Hardly a rant,
Watch it here.
PS Wonderful self-serving press release from the bonkers Lance Price at the Kaleidoscope Trust here.
Where the Mail got their non-story from. Cheers, SG.
Update: I despair of the fucking Guardian.
Labels:
Daily Mail,
the queen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




