At the time of typing Mail Online readers are surprisingly supportive...
I don't get what the big deal is? It's not his mothers egg that was fertilized by his sperm, so there's technically no 'blood relation'? She was merely the "oven" for the "bun", the capsule for the fetus to grow in? I see absolutely nothing wrong with this situation at all. If my son was gay and could not conceive a child on his own, or even if he wasn't gay, but couldn't find a woman to carry his child, I would do the same thing for him. A mother's love for her son is undeniable and I'm betting that 90% of the mothers reading this article would do the same.
PS However Mail columnist, Amanda Platell, thinks it's disgusting...
It is a story so unusual, it's almost hard to get your head around it — and one that, quite frankly, leaves me feeling deeply queasy...
Etc etc etc...
How can anyone not look at those photos and think that this is anything less than wonderful?
ReplyDelete