Bet they were conflicted on how to deal with this one.
Via @suttonnick #tomorrowspaperstoday
More in the morning, but brace yourself for an avalanche of tired and unfunny Queen/queens jokes.
Also, please bear in mind as this is the Mail the story may, just possibly, have been slightly distorted...
Update: BREAKING! Queen not joining OutRage shock!
To say the rather mundane MoS story doesn't match the hyperbolic/hyperbollocks headline would be almost as much of an overstatement as... well, as the Mail On Sunday's silly headline.
In fine, she's signing the new Commonwealth charter - a formality, she didn't write it FFS - which doesn't even explicitly mention LGBT people or gay rights.
It apprently reads; ‘We are implacably opposed to all forms of discrimination, whether rooted in gender, race, colour, creed, political belief or other grounds.’
But if "other grounds" is being used as a euphemism for sexuality, err, isn't that a bit discriminatory?
Update 2: Astounded by the over-excited comments about this from some gay men on blogs and Twitter etc, like it's the best thing since sliced cock.
Can't believe how grateful some people are for bum-all.
Update 3: This is getting ridiculous. Before long the Twittersphere will have turned this story into 'Queen to
sing Somewhere Over The Rainbow with the Gay Men's Chorus...'
NB I could be wrong but as far as I'm thus far aware there is no evidence that references to "sexuality" were omitted so as not to offend Commonwealth countries with anti-gay laws, apart from an unattributed assertion made in the notoriously unreliable Mail - which others appear to have simply repeated.
It could have been taken out by a diplomat or civil servant who thought it might embarrass "her majesty", for example.
It's not something the Foreign & Commonwealth Office would comment on - so where is it from?
Showing posts with label Gay Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gay Rights. Show all posts
Saturday, 9 March 2013
Sunday, 3 July 2011
Britain Thinks: Our Survey Says
"When asked whether gay couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples, 76% of the working class felt they should, compared with 70% of the middle class. The working class were also marginally more likely to have had a relationship with someone of another race..."Poll by the centre-left thinktank BritainThinks.
The polling was done from focus groups - quote from The Sunday Times.
Fagburn believes he's right in thinking polls tend to get more gay-positive results when they ask a general question like this, rather ask people their positions on specific gay legislation...
• Another plug for the excellent Chavs: The Demonization Of The Working Class by my close, personal showbiz pal, Owen Jones.
Labels:
Britain Thinks,
Chavs,
class,
Gay Rights,
Owen Jones
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
