Showing posts with label Sainsburys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sainsburys. Show all posts

Thursday, 16 October 2014

Brighton: Kissing To Be Clever

When I arrived in Brighton as an 18-year-old, I expected to find some sort of queer paradise: the kind of place where rainbow flags lined the streets and poodles and gimps crawled interchangeably on leads in the hands of beautiful drag queens. Or, at least a bit more of that kind of stuff than what the urinals of a drab Doncaster shopping centre had to offer.

However, after a few weeks as a student in the city, the honeymoon was over. Paradise begins to look a bit less fabulous when your friend gets beaten up on his way home with another man. Brighton, like everywhere else, is home to bigots...


When I arrived at work on Monday morning and saw the lead story in the local paper – that two young women were told they’d be chucked out of Sainsbury’s if they continued to “display public signs of affection” – it stirred a familiar sickness in my gut.


Gay couple asked to leave Sainsbury's after a peck on the cheek, The Argus.

Still can't believe this happened in Brighton...

Sunday, 12 October 2014

Reader Feedback Of The Day: The Times

The Times Online - via @JulesMattsson

From an amusing piece on Mirror Online; Lesbians banned from kissing in Sainsburys: 10 ridiculous things people say to female same-sex couples.

Fagburn does find it hard to believe they were told off in a supermarket in Brighton, unless they were properly lezzing it up - if so, bring it on, lesbe ladies!

Tuesday, 1 April 2014

Antony Cotton: Covered Up

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

Censorship: Under Cover

'Sainsbury’s supermarket have been forced to defend placing a modesty cover over an issue of Attitude Magazine dedicated to tackling young people’s issue and homophobic bullying. The cover, which contains a fully clothed Daniel Radcliffe, was hidden from view on a high shelf in Sainsbury’s Dalston Junction, and spotted by freelance writer Scott Bryan.
'Sainsbury’s defended the decision to So So Gay. A spokesman told us, ”Following feedback from customers we introduced modesty covers several years ago across a wide variety of magazines. This is to ensure no offence is caused to customers who may object to the images or the content on the covers of some magazines. The titles that do have modesty covers do so for every edition so no particular cover is ever singled out.”

So So Gay.
Don't say Fagburn didn't try to warn you.
Endlessly.
Who cares who objects to a man with his shirt off, or a woman looking a bit "saucy"?
There is a concerted campaign to stop shops selling "adult" magazines with a bit of flesh.
The world has moved on, stop giving into pious prudery and trying to drag it back.
The human body is not offensive or obscene.
Anyone who thinks so is an even bigger mentalist than me.
Does Sainsburys want a list of things they sell that I find offensive?
It'd go on for days, but would probably start with every edition of The Daily Mail.
Will they cover that up?

'Mankind can keep alive thanks to its brilliance
In keeping its humanity repressed.
For once you must try not to shrink from facts;
Mankind survives... by bestial acts.'

Bertolt Brecht, The Threepenny Opera