Showing posts with label Matthew Todd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew Todd. Show all posts

Monday, 3 October 2016

Attitude: Exciting News!

In no way has the British gay media gone into meltdown.

This may be one reason why Matthew Todd walked last month.

Have the feeling there won't be an issue in 2017.

Could be wrong.

'Stream Publishing’s award-winning contract publishing portfolio includes titles produced for blue-chip clients CityJet, Cunard, Flybe, Hertz, Liberty, McColl’s Retail Group, P&O Cruises, SPAR and Vauxhall‎, as well as the wholly-ownedWinq, the luxury lifestyle magazine for gay men.'

Maybe not.

PS Who the felch would want to read anything after these cover lines?


And who the fuck is Nyle Dmarco?

Sorry, but this looks like patronising 'right-on' tokenism.

£5 for something boring you could read for free in QX!

Monday, 20 June 2016

Matthew Todd: Straight-Jacket

Oh boo hoo we is all victims but why do we hate ourselves so much?

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Attitude: 'One Loves One's Gay Fans'


And no one is a moral authority just because they dropped out of a royal vagina.

I don't care what the brain dead in-bred 'think' about anything.

Sake.

PS This is Matthew Todd's last issue as editor.

Saturday, 14 May 2016

Headline Of The Month: The Sun

The Sun.

Peter Allott taught at top public school, St Benedict's.

Noted alumni: Peter Ackroyd, Julian Clary, Matthew Todd.

Friday, 6 November 2015

Attitude: Inevitably

Attitude explores the reality of ‘chemsex’ and the rising use of party drugs like crystal meth, mephedrone and GHB across an in-depth, 18-page feature. We hear from 18 gay/bisexual men, who talk frankly about their own personal experience of using drugs and the devastating affect its had on both themselves and those around them.

Attitude.

Not read it yet, but presume they haven't just spoken to 18 men that drugs have had a 'devastating affect' [Effect?] on, yes?

Update: I was touched by Matthew Todd's editor's letter acknowledging how much Fagburn has set the agenda for the chemsex debate. x

PS Can people stop saying variations on 'Let's talk about gay sex and drugs' - have you not noticed EVERYBODY IS? 

Even if they're usually just quoting London's in-no-way hysterical anti-chemsex party cabal...


Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Chemsex: Exterminate! Exterminate!

So looking ahead, what’s the future for chemsex within our communities?

Easy. We’ll eradicate it. Quicker than it started. We’ll do it through kindness, tolerance, and dialogue. We’ll do it by reflecting on what it means to be an awesome, great gay man, and by being productive, fearless contributors to a robust gay community. How many gay men does it take to screw in this lightbulb? Every single damned one of us, together. I have faith. See ya later chemsex, you’re licked. 


The quite astonishing conclusion to an article in FS by David Stuart.

David runs the 'chemsex clinics' at 56 Dean Street.


Surely the first drugs worker/campaigner who wants to 'eradicate' drug use since Nancy 'Just say no' Reagan?

Here's a role play video where David advises a chemsexer he'd be happier if he went for nice romantic meals instead.

PS Thanks to How Upsetting.



David Stuart will be talking at this next month, The Rise Of Chemsex.

Joining Matthew [Todd] in an explosive discussion will be William Fairman and Max Gogarty directors of the new feature length documentary ‘CHEMSEX’; David Stuart, Substance Use Lead at 56 Dean Street and Pat Cash organiser of the popular ‘Let’s Talk About Gay Sex and Drugs’ events...

Forgive me, but don't all the panellists agree that 'Chemsex = sad/bad/mad/wrong'?

If so, I can't see the 'discussion' being that 'explosive'.

What's that phrase? 'A herd of independent minds...'

Thursday, 25 June 2015

Attitude: 21

Attitude is celebrating its 21st birthday.

Editing a mainstream gay magazine must be an absolute nightmare for anyone with any principles, there's an interview with Matthew Todd here.

Saturday, 20 April 2013

Telegraph: How Thatcherite Are You?

From an online Telegraph poll.

The fact that Thatcher voted in favour of partially decriminalising homosexuality in 1967 has been endlessly cited by idiots as proof that she must have (secretly?) loved The Gays.
Well, as Matthew Todd put the counter argument in a Guardian piece; "Whoop-dee-doo". 

PS Interesting to see certain gay news sites now desperately trying to show they didn't think Thatcher was absolutely a-okay. Shame they had to be shamed into doing so...

Saturday, 2 February 2013

The Guardian: Gay Shame?

The roots of gay shame  

If you didn't think you were worth caring about in the first place, why would you care if you caught HIV? News that rates of the virus in gay men remain stubbornly high is depressingly predictable. Despite the "it's great being gay in the UK" mantra, people are dying, and not just because of Aids. There is an epidemic of chronic alcohol and drug misuse, fuelled by society's homophobia. It plays out in a gay culture that celebrates obliteration and quick, easy sex... 

Matthew Todd, The Guardian, Cif.

Oh Matthew, you should know better...
How is gay men going out and having fun on a Saturday night "an epidemic of chronic alcohol and drug misuse"?
I dream about it.
How is having "quick and easy sex" bad?
I dream about it.
Things like this make me glad to be gay.
How is two men dying a "spate of drug deaths in saunas".
I could go on.
"Gay Shame" is a bourgeois concept, but such complaints are not unusual from middle class children.

PS I agree with you that there is a lot of "gay shame" out there, but I think it lies elsewhere, and reveals itself in how we see other gay men, and how you try to damn them and distance yourselves from them.

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

Attitude: January 2013

I thought this was brilliant - cause of how it makes us question our assumptions about gay mag cover boys/beauty etc.
I could go on, but consider this cynic moved.
Brava, Maffew et al!

PS Can we have less sports and musicals next time, please? 

Friday, 22 July 2011

Johann Hari: Epic Fail

The August issue of Attitude has just come out.
Its star columnist, Johann Hari - who's normally bigged-up on the cover - is noticable by his absence.
Editor Matthew Todd had been - quite nobley, I think - defending Hari on Twitter.
But it's come out that Todd is one of the many journalists that Hari has nicked quotes from, so I'm not sure where they stand now (I have asked).
Others have turned on Hari.
Posters like the one above have supposedly been put up in the newsroom of The Independent - the paper has now suspended him for two months.
Some of the most serious allegations have come from former colleagues at the New Statesman, where he worked prior to joining The Indy.
Further, there are rumours that the reason why Hari was dropped both as a GQ contributor and as editor of Cambridge University's Varsity magazine was his journalistic flights of fancy.
Self-styled right-wing libertarian blogger Guido Fawkes has really been fanning the flames on this story - and some have argued that this is at heart a right-wing smear campaign.
This is clearly nonsense* - not least of which because Hari is hardly "left-wing".
Not only have most of the most damaging revelations come from New Statesman contributors, but arguably the most sustained and long-running critique of Hari's journalism has come from the - excellent - left-wing website, Media Lens.
Here is Noam Chomsky on Hari's "lies", "total ignorance" and "subservience... to power".
Presciently, writing to Media Lens in 2003, Chomsky concludes by recommending that Johann Hari should "try the experiment of literacy instead of repeating gossip he's heard somewhere."
Many have remarked how ironic/fitting it is that this scandal has been unravelling in the shadow of Hackgate.
Like the phone hacking story, when it began it seemed to centre on quite minor transgressions - the odd borrowed quote or bit of "creative writing" aren't great crimes in the general scheme of things.
But as with Hackgate, every week seems to bring more damning evidence of serious and serial ethical failure.
About which we knew.
For one example;
Johann Hari invented Iraqis who were supposedly asking for the US/UK to invade [All links to Johann Hari's website/archive have now been deleted - which says much].
Fuck this lying cheerleader of death.
The latest issue of Private Eye contains one of the most serious by far; a 2007 report from the Central African Republic so mendacious it "appalled" the charity that took him out there so much they complained to The Independent's editor.
And yet nothing was done.
Whatever next?

* It is worth noting though how many comments after Guido Fawkes posts show the most repugnant homophobia.

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Velvet Rage: We Hate Ourselves And We Want To Die

There's an interesting piece in The Observer today by Paul Flynn and Matthew Todd.
A sub at The Observer has done it a disservice by giving it the cliched and inappropriate headline; 'Pride and Prejudice For Gay Men'.
It's about a book by Alan Down called The Velvet Rage: Overcoming the Pain of Growing Up Gay in a Straight Man's World.
Apparently, this book; "...is becoming a touchstone in gay culture just as Christopher Isherwood's Goodbye to Berlin was in the 30s, Edmund White's A Boy's Own Story in the 60s [Eh? It was published in 1982 - Fagburn] and Larry Kramer's Faggots in the 70s. But The Velvet Rage is not fiction..."
Fagburn thinks that over-hype is a fiction, but go on...
"It addresses the myth of gay pride and, after three decades of post-Aids concentration on gay men's physical health, turns inward to their mental wellbeing."
Which is hardly novel.
"Its snappy title is slipping, sometimes ironically, into the gay lexicon. Man orders fifth pint at the bar: "It's OK, it's just my velvet rage." Boyfriend finds partner trawling through the thousands of profiles on sex-on-demand website Gaydar: "But it's my velvet rage."
Umm, no, now you're just making stuff up.
"Downs coined the phrase to refer to a very specific anger he encountered in his gay patients – whether it was manifested in drug abuse, promiscuity or alcoholism – and whose roots, the book argues, are found in childhood shame and parental rejection. "Velvet rage is the deep and abiding anger that results from growing up in an environment when I learn that who I am as a gay person is unacceptable, perhaps even unlovable," he explains. "This anger pushes me at times to overcompensate and try to earn love and acceptance by being more, better, beautiful, more sexy – in short, to become something I believe will make me more acceptable and loved."
Hmmm...
Fagburn often wishes he was better, more beautiful, more sexy, acceptable and loved - who doesn't?
And I agree I do have a very specific anger that I like to blame on my childhood, and Daddy not loving me and all that.
And I know i'm unlovable.
So what's new?
40 years on, Fagburn thinks these lines from The Boys In The Band still ring painfully true;
"Show me a happy homosexual and I'll show you a gay corpse."
"If only we could just not hate ourselves quite so very much…”
I really don't think we've moved on that much, so I agree with the book's general premise; their point, I guess, is that this has endured.
But again, none of this is new; show me a gay magazine from the last 20 or 40 years that doesn't have an article about gay misery, our unjoy.
It's a lie and a stupid cliche to pretend that the gay press - for all its faults - is "happy-clappy".
Trusting Paul Flynn and Matthew Todd's judgment - I admire them both - I have ordered the book from Amazon.
As it is a self-help book, it will probably end up in a pile with all the other self-help books, near all the ones promising that I can; 'Learn Spanish The Easy Way'.
I still can't count up to five.

Sunday, 22 August 2010

Attitude: Are You A Sex Addict?


There's a full page article in The Observer today about gay men and mental health.
Well, sort of.
Straight outta the media's hall of mirrors it's actually an article about the new issue of Attitude magazine which is about gay men and mental health.
It's 'The Issues Issue'.
Attitude's editor Matthew Todd is quoted as saying it's "a big taboo".
Well, mental health certainly is, but the media absolutely adore this kind of "Being gay is rubbish" story - as The Observer piece shows.
Todd says; "There is this cliché that we are all having a great time partying, but actually we know, and the research is now showing, there are a hell of a lot of unhappy gay people; far higher rates of depression, anxiety and suicide than among straight men; far higher rates of self-destructive behaviour; substance abuse and sex addiction; and high levels of issues around intimacy and forming relationships."
All true. Fagburn is with Todd all the way on that - except the bit about "sex addiction"; which I think is a highly spurious concept and a media construct.
But anyway, Matthew Todd gives good quote, and Fagburn prefers seeing him being quoted in the straight press to the drivel machines they usually unearth.
"The gay scene is incredibly sexualised," Todd adds. "Kids come out into this sexualised world where there is lots of booze and lots of drugs, there's nothing that's just healthy, gentle and relaxed. It's empowering to have lots of sex, but only if that's what you actually want, if it's you making the choice."
Fair point. Though in an erotophobic culture like ours it's as often the case to find that sex - and especially gay sex - is problematised and demonised, just as it is celebrated.
"Repressive desublimation" they used to call it - though I've never been completely sure what it means.
And Fagburn suspects that a sense of unease about gay sex is arguably a surer sign that a gay man has "issues" than if he's having lots of sex.
Last month The Observer ran a major feature about gay men and sex, and that new-fangled gay cruising app, Grindr.
Matthew Todd was quoted in that too, striking the only note of dischord; "The commercial gay world – which Grindr is part of – is a very adult, very sexual world. And I worry when I see these young kids coming out on to the gay scene, and everything is about sex. There's no real concept of relationships."
You can say that again. Oh hang on, you have.
The last word here goes to TheChris who posted the following after today's Observer article.
"I thought this was a spoof at first. Attitude is one of the very worst contributors to the sexualised gay culture that Matthew Todd says he's recovering from. "The gay scene is incredibly sexualised", he says - and he should know. How many sex issues has Attitude published? How many youth issues? How many celebrities have they paid to pose naked, perfectly groomed and photoshopped?"
See if you can guess what they've put on the cover of "The Issues Issue" of Attitude?